09/13/2014, 07:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 09/13/2014, 07:40 PM by sheldonison.)

(09/12/2014, 06:35 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: How does the difference between fake_exp^[0.5](z) and Kneser_exp^[0.5](z) look like ?Below, is a log_10/log_10 plot of both ratios, from 0.1 to 10^6. The fakeexp asymptotic is accurate to >30 decimal digits at 10^6, using only 55-60 terms. btw, there is also a pretty good asymptotic for sinh^{0.5}, almost as good as the one for exp^{0.5}. Tommy might have been interested in sinh(z)/exp(z) which converges exponentially to '1', much quicker than the fakeexp converges.

....

And how about the difference of fake_exp^[0.5](z) with 2sinh^[0.5](z) ?

....

In particular I consider there differences for Re(z) > 0.

Have you seen this excellent asymptotic entire series? I can't explain it, other than it matches the "fakefunc" integral

- Sheldon