Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Problem with cauchy method ?
#1
The Cauchy method has the property/condition (assum it works) :

exp(f(-1 +ai)) = f(ai)
exp(f(ai)) = f(1+ai)

for real a.

But is that sufficient to conclude f(z+1) = exp(f(z)) ?
Compare to x sin(x/2 pi) for integer x.

However the answer is YES ITS SUFFICIENT.
Because exp(f(-1 +ai)) - f(ai) = 0 and then use analytic continuation.

But what about the theta wave ? How do we know we arrive at a (unique) solution that is bounded in the strip ?

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [MSE] short review/implem. of Andy's method and a next step Gottfried 0 46 09/27/2022, 04:16 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Is this the beta method? bo198214 3 257 08/18/2022, 04:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Describing the beta method using fractional linear transformations JmsNxn 5 274 08/07/2022, 12:15 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question The Etas and Euler Numbers of the 2Sinh Method Catullus 2 244 07/18/2022, 10:01 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Tommy's Gaussian method. tommy1729 34 9,964 06/28/2022, 02:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The beta method thesis JmsNxn 9 1,550 04/20/2022, 05:32 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  tommy beta method tommy1729 0 668 12/09/2021, 11:48 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The Generalized Gaussian Method (GGM) tommy1729 2 1,426 10/28/2021, 12:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Arguments for the beta method not being Kneser's method JmsNxn 54 17,297 10/23/2021, 03:13 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  tommy's singularity theorem and connection to kneser and gaussian method tommy1729 2 1,369 09/20/2021, 04:29 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)