Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[2015] New zeration and matrix log ?
#1
Ive been thinking about zeration lately.

a[0]b = max(a,b) + 1.

This has some nice properties , however you cannot invert it.

For example , 2[0]4 = 4+1 = 5.

But 5[0]? = 2 does not seem to have a solution.
Also inverting seems troublesome since 2[0]4 = 3[0]4.

I was able to find additional arguments/properties for max(a,b)+1.

But its still the same function.

Then there is ln(exp(a) + exp(b)).

However this does not belong to the family q^x , q x , q + x , ... where x is variable and q is fixed(base).
but rather to the family x^ln(y) = y^ln(x) , x y , x+ y , ... where both x,y are variables and everything is commutative.

( and then there is offcourse the meaningfull but boring opinion that zeration is ALSO addition ; the inverse super of x+1 is x+1 => argument )

What else could exist ?

I got inspired by myself when I was considering equations like
f^[A(x)] (B(x)) = C(x) in my early teen years.

To keep a long story short here is the logic :

Base 2 is "holy" here.

2^^2 = 4
2^2 = 4
2*2 = 4
2+2 = 4

However 2[0]2 is not necessarily 4.
This turned out to be a wasted effort to zeration.
so zeration is not x+1 and not x+2.

So we need a new way to look at things without going to the max(a,b)+1 and ln(exp(a)+exp(b)) solutions.

And that logic is this :

...

2^2^2^... = 2^^x
2*2*2*... = 2^x
2+2+2+... = 2 x
2[0]2[0]2[0]... = 2 + x

I use {} for function names. C_1 ,C_2 , ... are constants.

The trend is {[q]2}^[x + C_1](C_2) = 2[q+1]x + f(q)

where f(q) = 0 for integer q.

SO for zeration we get

{[0]2}^[x + C_1](C_2) = 2 + x.

So we try to find the function T = T(z) = {[0]2}(z).

T^[x + C_1](C_2) = 2 + x. [equation 1]

or
C_2 = T^[ - x - C_1] (2 + x) [equation 2]

However solving equation 2 seems like a mistake , solving equation 1 seems like the correct way ;

From equation 1 we get

C_3 = T^[1](C_2) = {2 + x}^[1/(x + C_1)]

Now let CARL_2 be the carleman matrix for 2 + x , and
Carl(") be the carleman matrix of ".

Then we get the matrix equation

Carl(C_3) = CARL_2 ^ [1/(x + C_1)]

Let EXP be the matrix exponential and LOG be the matrix ln of CARL_2.

Carl(C_3) = EXP( LOG / (x + C_1) ) or = EXP ( 1/(x + C_1) * LOG ).

If this equation holds in SOME WAY then we have solution to zeration.

But there may be issues with the matrix ideas.

Or others ?

I wonder what you guys think.

Gottfried and myself have investigated the matrix logarithm and similar problems ... as did others.

The matrix log is " semi-classical " as I like to call it.
It is classical as the inverse of EXP but if A^B = exp(ln(A)*ln(B)) or if A^B = exp(ln(B)*ln(A)) ... what is the log of a nilpotent ... connections to tetration and other controversial research ... makes it non-classical.

This might lead to a new zeration ?

Or maybe a variation of this idea will ?

regards

tommy1729


Reply
#2
(03/24/2015, 12:17 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: a[0]b = max(a,b) + 1.

Then there is ln(exp(a) + exp(b)).

Maybe there is more than one zeration the way that there is more than one tetration (right bracket and left bracket)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Zeration GFR 80 95,117 10/31/2016, 02:57 PM
Last Post: Stanislav
  Tommy's matrix method for superlogarithm. tommy1729 0 1,450 05/07/2016, 12:28 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Zeration reconsidered using plusation. tommy1729 1 2,674 10/23/2015, 03:39 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  2015 Continuum sum conjecture tommy1729 3 3,037 05/26/2015, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Is this close to zeration ? tommy1729 0 1,804 03/30/2015, 11:34 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2015] Spiderweb theory tommy1729 0 1,650 03/29/2015, 06:25 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2015] 4th Zeration from base change pentation tommy1729 5 5,195 03/29/2015, 05:47 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2015] s(exp(d(x))) = x + 2 tommy1729 1 1,941 03/26/2015, 05:35 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Conjecture on semi-exp base change [2015] tommy1729 0 1,534 03/24/2015, 03:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 fixpoint pairs [2015] tommy1729 0 1,599 02/18/2015, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)