• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 [2015] Spiderweb theory tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,358 Threads: 330 Joined: Feb 2009 03/29/2015, 06:25 PM (This post was last modified: 03/29/2015, 09:44 PM by tommy1729.) After thinking about tetration and fake function theory it is time for the 3rd topic which I started years ago at sci.math. Chapter 3 : Spiderweb theory. It all started - like most things started on sci.math - with a flame war. And maybe my knowledge is not big enough , its possible. But they did not answer my questions either. It started by talking about Taylor series. They said they only converge within a radius. Just like with the axiom of choice , I had some objections ... well conditional objections. Using summability methods it is possible for some Taylor series with a nonzero radius to be valid outside the expansion point. Here is a simple example : f(x) = 0 + 2^2^1 x + 2^2^1 x^2 + 2^2^2 x^3 + 2^2^2 x^4 + ... Now this has a radius 0 at x = 0. but for x = -1 this function gives f(-1) = 0. SO it converges outside its radius. More complicated examples can converge in many places. Many summabilty methods exist. Im not sure how it all works though. But assume it converges in a spiderweb shape. That is to say the points where it converges are dense on a spiderweb shape. ( like the roots of unity are dense on the unit circle ) What is the theory behind that ? I believe a nonzero radius Taylor series cannot converge in a region with a positive area that is connected to the expansion point unless that is part of the boundary of a radius of another expansion point. Also if for instance every VALID (leading to convergeance) point q gives f(q) = 0 then we say the analytic continuation is f(z) = 0. That crazy idea is part 1 of the spiderweb theory. part 2 : An example : $T(x) = \frac {(exp x - 1 + 0.5 x^2)^{[1/2]}} {(exp x - 1)^{[1/2]}}$ I think T(x) is analytic or it converges in a spiderweb. edit : another example : $R(x) = \frac {(x + x^2 + x^3)^{[1/2]}} {(x + x^3)^{[1/2]}}$ I think R(x) is analytic or it converges in a spiderweb. regards tommy1729 « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 3,457 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM Last Post: MphLee Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument. tommy1729 1 1,773 12/08/2015, 11:14 PM Last Post: tommy1729 2015 Continuum sum conjecture tommy1729 3 3,080 05/26/2015, 12:24 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2015] 4th Zeration from base change pentation tommy1729 5 5,259 03/29/2015, 05:47 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2015] s(exp(d(x))) = x + 2 tommy1729 1 1,965 03/26/2015, 05:35 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Conjecture on semi-exp base change [2015] tommy1729 0 1,558 03/24/2015, 03:14 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2015] New zeration and matrix log ? tommy1729 1 2,884 03/24/2015, 07:07 AM Last Post: marraco 2 fixpoint pairs [2015] tommy1729 0 1,618 02/18/2015, 11:29 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [number theory] sieving with a_i mod p_i tommy1729 7 7,116 09/12/2014, 07:28 AM Last Post: tommy1729 " fake ring theory " tommy1729 0 1,746 06/11/2014, 11:29 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)